Scope 2 emissions reporting explained

Author

Eloise Moench

Eloise has worked in a number of high growth start ups and scale ups with a focus on sustainability and renewable energy. She is now FlexiDAO’s Energy Marketing Lead.
Published
April 14, 2021
Updated
May 31, 2023

The number of companies reporting on carbon emissions is growing each year but many struggle with the complexity of quantifying their Scope 2 emissions.

Companies are under increasing pressure to engage with the climate crisis. Customers, employees, and investors are demanding climate action - influencing corporates to disclose their climate impact and make credible climate goals. This has led to a huge growth in the number of companies disclosing their emissions through different sustainability standards. 

One of the most widely used and recognized standards for measuring and disclosing greenhouse gas emissions is the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP), which is based on the principles and guidelines of the GHG Protocol. More than 9,000 companies from different sectors and regions around the world are currently using the CDP reporting process.

Scope 2 emissions are a key part of annual sustainability reporting, but it’s an area that many companies struggle to report accurately. 

In this article, we review the basics of Scope 2 emissions and discuss some considerations you need to be aware of for your annual energy and carbon reporting. We hope to answer some of your questions regarding Scope 2 to help with your annual reporting, and avoid potential pitfalls in the process.

What are Scope 2 emissions?

Scope 2 emissions are defined as an indirect category of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the GHG Protocol Scope 2 Guidance, updated in 2015.

These emissions encompass the GHG emissions resulting from the consumption of purchased or acquired electricity, steam, heat, or cooling by the reporting company. While Scope 2 includes steam, heat, and cooling, the majority of Scope 2 emissions arise from companies importing electricity from the grid.

It's important to differentiate Scope 2 emissions from Scope 1 and Scope 3 emissions. Scope 1 emissions cover direct emissions generated on-site or by company-owned vehicles, while Scope 3 emissions pertain to a company's supply chain emissions.

What forms of energy are tracked in Scope 2 emissions?

The forms of energy tracked under Scope 2 report include:

  1. Electricity: Almost all companies rely on electricity for their operations. Scope 2 emissions associated with electricity are generated when power plants burn fossil fuels off-site to generate electricity. Although the reporting company does not directly burn the fossil fuels, it bears responsibility for the resulting emissions.
  2. Steam: Large industries often use steam for heating, cleaning, or as a direct input in their processes. Scope 2 emissions related to steam typically arise when it is provided through a combustion asset such as a boiler or thermal power plant that is not under the company's operational control.
  3. Heat: Heat can take various forms, but companies commonly utilize it as low to high-temperature hot water. If an office, for example, receives heat through a local district heat network operated by a third-party, the emissions associated with that heat would fall under Scope 2.
  4. Cooling: Companies that require cooling for their operations, such as in cold storage facilities, may obtain cooling from third-party sources. In such cases, the emissions associated with the supplied cooling would be categorized as Scope 2. For instance, if a company receives chilled water from a third-party-owned and operated chiller, the emissions would be considered Scope 2.

By tracking and accounting for Scope 2 emissions, companies gain a comprehensive understanding of their indirect environmental impact and can develop strategies to reduce their carbon footprint throughout their energy consumption processes.

Location-based and market-based Scope 2 emissions reporting methodologies.

It’s also relevant to mention that one of the main changes in the update was the introduction of location-based and market-based Scope 2 emissions and its reporting methods. Which can make you wonder, what is location-based and market-based methods?

As Greenhouse Gas Protocol have mentioned in their executive summary of the amendment to the GHG Protocol Scope 2 Guidance:

Methods for scope 2 accounting are “allocation” methods—allocating generator emissions to end-users. A location-based method reflects the average emissions intensity of grids on which energy consumption occurs (using mostly grid-average emission factor data).”

Market-based Scope 2 emissions takes a more complex look at emissions and considers any contractual instruments that may be used in competitive energy markets. This means that any green tariffs, renewable certificates, or PPA’s are considered in the final market-based emission calculation.

“A market-based method reflects emissions from electricity that companies have purposefully chosen (or their lack of choice). It derives emission factors from contractual instruments, which include any type of contract between two parties for the sale and purchase of energy bundled with attributes about the energy generation, or for unbundled attribute claims.

For most multinational companies, this has led to a dual-reporting requirement for Scope 2 emissions.

What data is needed in Scope 2 emissions CDP reporting?

The Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) has become the standard for voluntary sustainability reporting. Scope 2 emissions play a crucial role in the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) reporting, a widely recognized standard for voluntary sustainability reporting. Accurately reporting Scope 2 emissions is vital as it can have a substantial impact on a company's final score within the CDP assessment. For further information on sustainability reporting, you may find our article insightful.

To assist you in understanding the essential data needed for reporting Scope 2 emissions under the CDP framework, we have outlined the primary CDP questions that pertain to Scope 2 reporting:

  • Question: C5.1 - Provide your base year and base year emissions (Scopes 1 and 2).

Data is needed for both market-based and location-based emissions of Scope 2 in the base year.

  • Question: C6.3 - What were your organisation’s gross global Scope 2 emissions in metric tons CO2e?

Data is required to reflect the total global Scope 2 emissions for the reporting year, including any relevant data from previous years, if applicable.

  • Question: C7.5 - Break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by country/region.

This question asks for data that provides a breakdown of emissions per country. Additionally, data is required for purchased electricity, steam, heat, and cooling in megawatt-hours (MWh), as well as the proportion of this energy that is categorized as low carbon.

  • Question: C7.6 (a/b/c) - Break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by business division/facility or activity.

For this question, it is necessary to provide location and market-based emission data in metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (Mton CO2e). If segregated data is available, it is recommended to fill in all sub-questions to offer a comprehensive disclosure of the company's emissions sources and their respective locations. This will provide a detailed overview of the company's emission footprint and enhance transparency regarding the origin and distribution of emissions.

  • Question: C8.2a - Report your organisation’s energy consumption totals (excluding feedstocks) in MWh.

Data is required for Scope 2 emission sources in megawatt-hours (MWh) from both renewable and non-renewable sources. It is important to note that higher scores are awarded for a greater percentage of renewable energy within the total energy supply.

  • Question: C8.2e - Provide details on the electricity, heat, steam, and/or cooling amounts that were accounted for at a zero emission factor in the market-based Scope 2 figure reported in C6.3.

Detailed data is needed to provide information on renewable energy claims under Scope 2. Specifically, the data should include details about renewable sources, such as unbundled energy attribute certificates and Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs). This information should encompass the technology type, megawatt-hours (MWh) consumed, and the region where the consumption takes place.

  • Question: C10.1 - Indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your reported emissions. 

The question pertains to whether the Scope 2 emissions have undergone verification. Points can be earned if there is a third-party verification or assurance process in place to validate the accuracy and reliability of the reported emissions.

Review the full guidance on CDP reporting on the CDP website.

How to report Scope 2 emissions without renewable certificates?

When it comes to reporting Scope 2 emissions, companies often utilize contractual instruments like Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) and Guarantees of Origin (GOs) to offset their emissions. However, there are situations where these certificates may not be available. In such cases, it is important to understand the alternative steps to report accurately. Here's a breakdown of different scenarios and the corresponding reporting approach:

  1. On-site Generation (Owned/Operated): If your company owns an on-site power plant, any emissions generated by the plant should be reported under Scope 1. However, in the case of a renewable plant, such as a solar rooftop array, no emissions need to be reported.
  2. Direct Line (Third-Party Owner, e.g., Power Purchase Agreement): Some large industries have direct power supply arrangements with generators. If no renewable certificates are available in this scenario, you should use the source-specific emission factor to determine emissions. In the case of a renewable plant, the source emission factor is likely to be zero, indicating no emissions.
  3. Grid Power: When renewable power consumed from the grid is not backed by certificates, reporting Scope 2 emissions requires following the market-based emission factor hierarchy. This involves finding the next most accurate reporting factor. For instance, if certificates are unavailable, you can use the emission factor provided by your supplier. If that information is not accessible, then the grid's average emission factors can be utilized. 

By following these steps, companies can report their Scope 2 emissions even without renewable certificates, ensuring accurate and transparent reporting. While renewable certificates are beneficial for demonstrating commitment to clean energy, understanding the alternatives allows companies to fulfill their reporting obligations effectively.

How to reduce Scope 2 emissions?

To effectively reduce your Scope 2 emissions, it is crucial to focus on addressing the main source of emissions - imported grid electricity. By actively engaging in the purchase of renewable energy, you can make significant progress in reducing your environmental impact.  

Renewable energy can be accounted for as zero carbon in Scope 2 reporting. The most common renewable energy purchasing options are outlined below:

  1. Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs):
    RECs represent the environmental attributes of renewable energy generation and can be purchased separately from the electricity. By buying RECs, you support renewable energy projects and can claim the associated emissions reductions in your Scope 2 reporting. This is a flexible option that allows you to support renewable energy without directly changing your electricity supplier.
  2. Green Supply Tariffs: Green tariffs are offered by electricity suppliers and allow customers to choose a tariff that supports renewable energy. By opting for a green tariff, you ensure that a portion or all of the electricity you consume is sourced from renewable energy generators. This can be an accessible and straightforward way to increase your renewable energy consumption and reduce Scope 2 emissions.
  3. Power Purchase Agreement (PPA): PPAs involve long-term contracts with renewable energy generators. Through a PPA, your organization can directly purchase electricity from a specific renewable energy project. This ensures a dedicated supply of renewable energy and allows you to claim the emissions reduction associated with that energy source. PPAs are often suitable for larger organizations with the capacity to enter into such agreements.
  4. On-site Renewable Generation: Installing renewable energy systems on your premises, such as solar panels or wind turbines, enables you to generate clean energy directly. By producing renewable energy on-site, you can significantly reduce your reliance on grid electricity and lower your Scope 2 emissions. This option provides long-term sustainability benefits and can often be combined with other renewable energy purchasing strategies.

When implementing these renewable energy purchasing options, it is essential to verify the environmental attributes and ensure that the energy sources meet recognized standards for sustainability. By actively reducing your reliance on fossil fuel-based grid electricity and transitioning to renewable energy sources, you can effectively reduce your Scope 2 emissions and contribute to a more sustainable future.

Each renewable energy purchasing option has unique characteristics, and the suitability of each option may vary depending on the company's specific circumstances. To gain a comprehensive understanding of each option, we invite you to explore our recent article, "Purchasing Renewable Energy: Energy Products Compared."

This article provides an in-depth analysis of each renewable energy purchasing option, allowing you to make informed decisions based on your organization's needs and goals. By delving into the details of each option, you can navigate the renewable energy landscape with confidence and choose the most effective approach to reduce your environmental impact.

Enhancing Scope 2 emissions reporting with digital tools

Accurately reporting Scope 2 emissions can be daunting, especially when dealing with multiple sites across different countries and the challenges of obtaining energy certificates from suppliers. Additionally, organizations often face issues with inconsistent and delayed availability of energy consumption data throughout their operations.

To address these challenges, new digital tools and software solutions have emerged, revolutionizing the data collection process for Scope 2 emissions reporting. These innovative tools consolidate all the essential Scope 2 emissions data into a single, reliable platform by leveraging direct integrations with certificate registries or grid operator platforms. This automation eliminates human errors, enhances data accuracy, ensures timely collection, and streamlines the verification process. It also helps making better and faster procurement decisions due to the digitization of renewable contracts and certificates.

While meeting the minimum reporting requirements for zero energy emissions as per the GHG Protocol, forward-thinking sustainability leaders are taking it a step further. They are now focusing on understanding the real environmental impact of their green energy procurement. This includes gaining insights into the specific power plants, regions, and timeframes associated with their energy sources. Blockchain technology, known for its transparency capabilities, can play a pivotal role in providing the desired visibility into the energy source.

How can blockchain help you with Scope 2 emissions reporting?

By embracing these digital advancements and leveraging blockchain technology, companies can enhance the credibility of their Scope 2 emisisons reporting, strengthen their environmental commitments, and make more informed decisions towards achieving their sustainability goals.

  1. Data Collection from the source: Blockchain serves as a transparency layer, acting as a digital notary that verifies the exact power plant associated with specific energy consumers at a given time. By leveraging blockchain, energy buyers can establish a clear trail of evidence, increasing their environmental ranking scores and ensuring the integrity of their Scope 2 emissions reporting.
  2. No Certificates Available: In regions where energy certificates are not readily accessible, blockchain can play a crucial role as a digital notary, providing evidence of where the energy was purchased and consumed. This allows energy buyers to validate their renewable energy claims and further reduce their Scope 2 emissions, even in the absence of traditional certificates.
  3. Verification and Auditability: Emissions verification is often a costly and time-consuming process. However, blockchain technology enables instant verification and eliminates the need for extensive human involvement. By leveraging blockchain's immutability and transparency, companies can streamline the verification process, significantly reducing costs associated with manual verification and ensuring auditability.

By harnessing the capabilities of blockchain, organizations can enhance the trust, transparency, and credibility of their Scope 2 emissions reporting. Through reliable data collection, proof of renewable energy sourcing, and efficient verification processes, blockchain empowers companies to demonstrate their commitment to sustainability and achieve their environmental goals.

If you're interested in exploring how we can assist you with your Scope 2 emission reporting, reach out to us. Our team is dedicated to providing expert guidance and support in navigating the complexities of sustainability reporting. We have the expertise to help you achieve your sustainability reporting goals. 

Contact us today to discuss your specific needs and how we can best support your organization's Scope 2 emissions reporting efforts.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
SHARE
Published
April 14, 2021
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

See more blog posts

Challenges and Benefits of Granular Energy Emissions Data in Scope 2 Reporting

Updated:
August 11, 2023

Accurate Scope 2 emissions reporting, is vital in the evolving business landscape. Challenges include credibility issues, resource-intensive data collection, rising costs, and manual errors. Mandatory 2024 reporting requirements from the EU and US add pressure. Overcoming challenges offers cost savings via streamlined processes, increased credibility with proof of Energy Attribute Certificates (EACs), and improved team performance. This data also boosts marketing potential, avoids greenwashing scrutiny, and attracts ESG investment.

How To Choose a PPA: Physical vs Virtual PPAs

Updated:
July 13, 2023

Corporate Power Purchase Agreements (PPA) are becoming more popular, and continued growth in the market is expected. However, there are different options in the market that energy buyers need to be aware of. Learn about physical and virtual PPAs, their types and more.

A New Frontier: carbon-aware energy procurement

Updated:
June 30, 2023

Here is the first article of a seven-part series from our CEO, Simone Accornero, explaining our unique perspective in this engaging debate around corporate clean electricity procurement, energy certification, and carbon accounting.

Trusted by

Iron Mountain logo
Iron Mountain logo